Saturday, June 11, 2011

Mavs-Heat: Followup Thoughts on Clutch & Game 6

Kevin Pelton of Basketball Prospectus wrote a post this morning following up on our post from yesterday about Dallas' outstanding performance in close games in recent seasons, and it helped clarify my thinking further. While I would like to know specifically what Mark Cuban and Roland Beech (Dallas' primary statistical analyst) found in their research suggesting Jason Kidd was especially good at "win time", I wanted to note that I don't believe there is a mystical quality to clutch performance.

I believe the most important factor in consistently successful clutch play, offensively at least, is continue to run an offense which is similar to what's effective in the rest of the game - to get good shots above all.

Note that New Orleans is the one team that's been even better in close games than Dallas. That's no coincidence to me. They continue to run their offense, and they have a superstar in Chris Paul who (similar to Jason Kidd) primarily focuses on creating and finding good shots, wherever they may be, rather than devolving into hero offense.

And that's the alchemy that makes Dallas so good down the stretch, too: they keep running their offense and getting good shots, and Carlisle does an outstanding job of calling the right numbers and making the correct tweaks, such as the staggered pick-and-rolls which have been so effective in allowing Jason Terry to create good shots for himself and others late in games in the Finals. Yes, some of these are isolations, especially for Nowitzki, but they're generally similar to ones the Mavs run all game, putting Dirk in position to create good shots in mid-range areas.

Meanwhile, looking back over the entire 2011 playoffs and the progression of LeBron James' performance as a clutch scorer, I think we can say he was rather lucky vs. Boston and Chicago, and rather unlucky vs. Dallas. He's been taking the same relatively low-percentage hero shots each time. Several of the contested threes he hit late vs. Boston/Chicago were worse than the clean look at a three he got late in Game 5 on Thursday.

Maybe the percentages are now such that LeBron is due to sink a few hero threes which carry Miami over the top in the next few days, but in my opinion, the best thing he can do is focus on better shots. In this matchup, I believe that he (and Wade too) can't really post up enough, even in crunch time. Dallas has had success walling off the lane from the perimeter for a good chunk of the series, and the smaller defenders have had a very tough time containing James and Wade whenever they've gone to the blocks. They've often needed a double-team, and both Miami superstars have carved those up with their passing.

Given that LeBron's average of 3.2 FTAs in the series is really hurting Miami, I also believe that working the low blocks gives him a better chance of getting to the line, though he does need to be more aggressive down low. James let Kidd off the hook late in Game 5, as he had him posted up, but turned it into a long step-back jumper. He needs to be aggressive enough to draw a double-team; he's such a good passer that his post-ups are probably even more efficient in producing points when he's passing out of a double-team.

I'm apparently in the minority of people who thought LeBron played very well overall in Game 5. I thought the passing by both James and Wade was truly exceptional - the two players combined for 11 assists on at-rim baskets overall. James created several points in the fourth quarter on aggressive plays that led to assists.

Also, if one late call - the charge taken by Chandler - which was correct but very close, goes the other way, there's likely a 180-degree difference in the perception of LeBron's game. Yes, as mentioned above, James wasn't aggressive enough against Kidd in the block, and he missed an open three that he dribbled into. His zero points scored in clutch situations in the series (vs. 26 for Dirk) have been a problem, without doubt.

But very few teams in the league would have beaten Dallas on Thursday, with the way they shot. Game 5 will not be the one Miami looks back on if they lose the series. It'll be Game 2 and Game 4. I don't think LeBron cost the Heat Game 5, but I do think he cost them Game 4 with his passivity, and that may end up being enough to cost Miami the series.

As I wrote in ESPN.com's 5-on-5 on Thursday before Game 5: Prior to last year's Game 5 versus Boston, LeBron had never truly let his teams down. Now he is on the verge of costing championship-quality teams playoff defeats as the better team in two straight years. I believe he's now at a defining crucible of his career, and I can't wait to see what happens.

Maybe it'll be fair, maybe it won't, but the perceptions of James, Wade and Nowitzki will likely be altered by what happens over the next three days. I have no idea what's going to happen, and I can't wait for the ball to go up at American Airlines Arena.

9 Comments:

At 6:02 PM, Blogger katie said...

great write up... My end thoughts, were on Cuban. There's reason why he's made the money he has...

 
At 10:35 PM, Blogger john marzan said...

haubs, do you think miami should go small in the 4th? sacrifice haslem (or bosh) for an extra shooter to

A) help their 4th quarter half court offense and spread mavs defense

b) run more and play lebron at PF?

 
At 1:51 AM, Blogger M. Haubs said...

Hey John: That's an interesting thought, for sure. I think it could help their offense, which has obviously needed all the help it can get late. But that leaves them with LeBron on Dirk, which could be trouble (though it would be fun to watch!).

 
At 1:55 AM, Blogger john marzan said...

or you could put lebron on chandler and bosh on dirk. it's not as if chandler is a major low post threat.

mavs don't run plays for tyson, and like lebron, the guy doesn't have a back to the basket game. he's just a rebounder/shotblocker + garbageman. i just want the miami offense to be clicking in the 4th and the lane decongested by 2 miami shooters.

 
At 3:13 PM, Anonymous Wadefan said...

While I do believe Lebron hit at least a couple lucky shots against the Celtics and the Bulls, most of those shots would not have gone in if the Bulls and the Celtics stopped Lebron from getting hot in the first place. Being a good jump shooter is all about confidence, and if you're confident from having already scored 25 points, you're more likely to make a crazy shot (sup Jason Terry) than if you're cold from stifling defense like Lebron has been against the Mavs.

One last thing. 2010 Cavaliers were definitely NOT better than the 2010 Celtics. Don't let the 4 seed fool you, they had 4 all stars and obviously saved their energy for the playoffs.

 
At 8:30 PM, Blogger All (or Most) Chicago Sports said...

Fascinating analysis. The Bulls, in Game 5 particularly, were leading Miami late because of unselfish team play, and became unglued at the end because they went away from that and asked Derrick Rose to do it by himself. I put that on the coaches, because Rose by instinct is unselfish. In contrast, Dallas, as you noted, just kept on running their plays.

 
At 4:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

ninest123 16.02
louis vuitton, louis vuitton, longchamp outlet, ray ban sunglasses, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet, michael kors, nike free, longchamp outlet, louboutin, ugg boots, burberry, prada outlet, tiffany jewelry, oakley sunglasses, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet, uggs on sale, burberry outlet online, tory burch outlet, prada handbags, oakley sunglasses, polo ralph lauren outlet, ugg boots, ugg boots, nike outlet, louboutin outlet, michael kors outlet, louis vuitton outlet, chanel handbags, jordan shoes, ugg boots, christian louboutin outlet, longchamp, replica watches, ray ban sunglasses, cheap oakley sunglasses, tiffany and co, nike air max, oakley sunglasses, louis vuitton, replica watches, louis vuitton outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet, ray ban sunglasses, louboutin shoes, oakley sunglasses, nike air max, gucci outlet

 
At 4:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

lululemon, vans pas cher, hollister, nike roshe, michael kors, michael kors, north face, hollister pas cher, oakley pas cher, true religion jeans, new balance pas cher, north face, coach purses, vanessa bruno, nike trainers, nike free, true religion outlet, burberry, nike air max, ralph lauren pas cher, hogan, ray ban pas cher, louboutin pas cher, nike air max, air max, air jordan pas cher, replica handbags, hermes, abercrombie and fitch, michael kors, nike free run uk, longchamp, true religion jeans, nike blazer, nike huarache, coach outlet, sac guess, converse pas cher, tn pas cher, mulberry, michael kors, nike roshe run, timberland, ray ban uk, ralph lauren uk, true religion jeans, longchamp pas cher, lacoste pas cher, sac longchamp, nike air max, air force

 
At 2:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I could not fault newyshoesmall.com the entire holiday from start to finish we have travelled all around the world and have never gone back to the same place but we would certainly go back there in a heart beat. Thank you coco Cheap Michael Kors Handbags palm. 3 and Oct. 14). The less GABA, the more nerve transmissions occur. Think what too much coffee feels like: that is the sensation of glutamate without enough GABA.. I come into work every day hard. I facebook.com had the opportunity in that at bat and I was lucky. Meanwhile, the proposed NIFS based speaker systems has achieves similar performance when we change the constraints (hyper parameters) or features, which indicates that it is easy to reproduce. Since NIFS is Michael Kors Outlet Store designed as a general algorithm, it could be further applied to other similar tasks.. Despite some notable successes, only a fraction of the genetic variation available in wild relatives has been utilized to produce superior wheat varieties. This is as a direct result of the lack of availability of suitable high throughput technologies to detect wheat/wild relative introgressions when they occur. So far as the method of obtaining consent is concerned, none of the existing consent processes reviewed by the research is satisfactory, and there are philosophical reasons for supposing that at least some parents will fail to give valid consent in a neonatal context. Finally, there are reasons for giving weight to both parental consent TM and the infant TMs best interests in both research and clinical treatment.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home